•6 min read
Why Love Feels Broken — And What We Can Do About It
Next
Discover What Moves You — And Who Moves With You
A gentle way to uncover what actually motivates you — and see how it aligns with the people in your life
Loading...
Next
A gentle way to uncover what actually motivates you — and see how it aligns with the people in your life
Here's a staggering disconnect: relationships account for roughly 70% of our life satisfaction, yet we spend almost zero time formally learning how to do them well. We study calculus, memorize historical dates, and learn to write persuasive essays — but when it comes to the single most consequential skill in human life, we're told to just follow our hearts.
Philosopher and psychotherapist Alain de Botton makes this case brilliantly in a recent Big Think video, Why Relationships Are So Hard, where he traces the roots of our modern relationship struggles back to an unlikely culprit: Romanticism.
Not romance — Romanticism. The cultural movement that rewired how we think about love, and in the process, made it almost impossible to succeed at it.
For most of human history, marriage was a pragmatic arrangement. De Botton describes how unions were "dynastic" — matching an ox with a plow, uniting kingdoms, pooling resources for survival. These partnerships weren't expected to provide emotional fulfillment. They weren't designed to. And while that sounds bleak by modern standards, there was an honesty to the arrangement: expectations were clear, and disappointment had boundaries.
Then came the Romantic Revolution. Starting in the late 18th century, a new idea took hold: that individuals should follow the "movements of their own heart." Love should be instinctive. Passion should be the compass. And if it feels right, it is right.
It was liberating. It was beautiful. And according to de Botton, it hasn't actually made us happier.
De Botton identifies several deeply ingrained beliefs — he calls them "prejudices" — that silently sabotage modern relationships:
We've been conditioned to believe that if love is working, it should flow from instinct, not deliberation. Discussing money, psychological patterns, or relationship dynamics on a third date feels clinical, transactional — unromantic. But these are precisely the conversations that make partnerships workable. By coding rationality as the opposite of love, we've stripped ourselves of the very tools we need to sustain it.
Romanticism teaches us to look for a "special fluttery feeling" — a partner who understands us without language, who completes us effortlessly. This expectation transforms the normal friction of two complex humans learning to coexist into evidence that something is wrong. Every miscommunication becomes a sign of incompatibility rather than an opportunity for growth.
In Romantic culture, asking a partner to change is seen as an act of rejection — proof that you don't truly accept who they are. De Botton contrasts this with the Ancient Greek view, where love was understood as a "process of education." The Greeks believed that a loving partner was someone who helped you become a better version of yourself, and you them. That's not rejection — it's investment.
De Botton places significant blame on art, film, and music for perpetuating these myths. Most love stories end at the beginning — the meet-cute, the first kiss, the wedding. Very few explore what comes after: the negotiation, the repair, the daily choice to stay and grow. He singles out Richard Linklater's Before trilogy as a rare exception — films that capture the real texture of long-term commitment, including its uncomfortable parts.
The result is a culture saturated with ideas about falling in love but almost silent on the subject of staying in love. We know how to swipe right. We don't know how to have a productive argument.
De Botton's prescription? Education. Classes in attachment theory, communication, apology, and self-awareness. Not as a replacement for passion, but as a foundation for it to actually survive.
This is where de Botton's philosophy intersects with something I've been building.
Connection Companion is a relationship tool designed for digital natives — people in the 25–40 age range who are comfortable with technology but underserved when it comes to relationship intelligence. It's built on the premise that de Botton articulates so well: love isn't something you find, it's something you learn.
The app doesn't try to replace the magic of connection. It tries to do what our culture has failed to do — give people the frameworks, language, and reflective practices to actually navigate intimacy. Think of it as the relationship education system that never existed:
Understanding your patterns. Instead of stumbling through the same dynamics relationship after relationship, Connection Companion helps you recognize your attachment tendencies, communication style, and emotional triggers — the raw material of self-awareness that de Botton argues is essential.
Reframing conflict as growth. Borrowing from the Greek model de Botton champions, the tool helps couples see disagreements not as evidence of failure but as opportunities for mutual development. It's the difference between "we're broken" and "we're building."
Making the rational romantic. Connection Companion normalizes the conversations that Romanticism told us to avoid — about needs, boundaries, expectations, and change. It makes reflection feel like an act of care, not a clinical exercise.
De Botton's core insight is a paradox: to make love work, we need to stop worshipping instinct and start thinking more rationally about the business of love. That doesn't mean draining relationships of their spontaneity or wonder. It means building a foundation sturdy enough for wonder to actually survive the realities of shared life.
We're not going to un-learn Romanticism. Nor should we want to. But we can evolve it — blending the passion that makes love worth pursuing with the self-knowledge that makes it sustainable.
That's what Connection Companion is designed to help people do. Not to algorithmically optimize love, but to give people the tools to show up for it — honestly, reflectively, and with more skill than our culture ever bothered to teach us.
Watch the full Alain de Botton video on Big Think: Why Relationships Are So Hard
Learn more about Connection Companion at ConnectionCompanion.com/blog or join today at ConnectionCompanion.com